The past month has seen a surge in legal challenges to immigration policies introduced by the Trump administration. These policies have sparked numerous lawsuits filed by advocacy groups, states, and immigrant organizations. Meanwhile, the Department of Justice (DOJ) under Attorney General Pam Bondi has pushed back with proactive lawsuits to ensure these policies are upheld. Understanding these legal challenges to immigration policies is crucial as they continue to unfold and influence immigration law enforcement.
Overview of Recent Lawsuits Challenging U.S. Immigration Policies
Closing the Border and Restricting Asylum Access
The lawsuit Refugee and Immigrant Center for Education and Legal Services et al v. Noem et al challenges Trump administration policies that have significantly reduced illegal border crossings. Plaintiffs argue that these policies unfairly limit asylum seekers, and the case could have major implications for border security. Briefs are due by March 31.
DHS “Sensitive Locations” Policy
Several lawsuits are contesting the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) repeal of prior restrictions on enforcement actions at sensitive locations, such as schools, hospitals, and places of worship. Under the new directive, officers have greater discretion in these areas, prompting legal pushback:
- Denver Public Schools v. Noem et al – Preliminary injunction denied, appeals expected.
- Mennonite Church USA et al v. DHS et al – Briefs due March 21.
- Philadelphia Yearly Meeting of the Religious Society of Friends et al v. DHS et al – Preliminary injunction granted, appeal due April 25.
Ending Refugee Funding
The administration’s decision to cut federal funding for organizations assisting refugee resettlement has led to multiple lawsuits:
- US Conference of Catholic Bishops v. Dept. of State – Amended motions filed.
- Catholic Charities Diocese of Fort Worth v. HHS – Temporary restraining order hearing on March 12.
- Pacito et al v. Trump et al – Briefs due April 7.
Ending Temporary Protected Status (TPS)
TPS for Venezuelan and Haitian nationals was terminated under the Trump Administration, prompting lawsuits seeking to reinstate protections:
- National TPS Alliance et al v. Noem et al – Motion hearing scheduled for March 24, with appeals likely.
- Haitian Americans United Inc. et al v. Trump et al – Briefs due March 21.
Birthright Citizenship
President Trump’s executive order, Protecting The Meaning And Value Of American Citizenship, has led to lawsuits challenging the exclusion of children born to undocumented immigrants from automatic U.S. citizenship:
- State of Washington et al v. Trump et al – Briefs due March 14.
- Casa Inc. et al v. Trump et al – Briefs due April 7.
- State of New Jersey et al v. Trump et al – Briefs due April 28.
Transferring Undocumented Immigrants to Guantanamo Bay
The lawsuit Las Americas Immigrant Advocacy Center et al v. Noem et al seeks to prevent the transfer of illegal aliens to the expanded immigration detention facility at Guantanamo Bay. Temporary restraining order hearing: March 14, appeal likely.
Expedited Removal
The case Make The Road New York v. Huffman et al seeks to halt DHS’s policy reinstating broad expedited removal proceedings for certain undocumented immigrants.
Expedited removal allows immigration officers to deport individuals without a hearing before a judge, creating significant risks for those unable to prove their continuous presence. To better understand how expedited removal works and what steps you can take to protect yourself, read our full guide: Protect Yourself from Expedited Removal.
Re-starting Construction of the Border Wall
The lawsuit Center for Biological Diversity v. USDA APHIS Wildlife Services et al challenges the Trump administration’s border wall project, citing environmental concerns.
Sanctuary Cities Under Legal Scrutiny
Among the most significant legal challenges to immigration policies, the DOJ has filed lawsuits against Illinois and New York over their sanctuary city policies, while sanctuary cities have launched counter-lawsuits to protect their status and federal funding:
- United States v. State of Illinois et al – Briefs due April 8.
- United States v. State of New York et al – Pending hearings.
- City and County of San Francisco et al v. Trump et al – Ongoing litigation.
The Ongoing Battle Over Immigration Laws
The legal landscape surrounding immigration policies remains in flux, with multiple lawsuits challenging federal enforcement measures and policy shifts. These legal battles reflect the deep divisions over immigration in the U.S., with courts playing a critical role in determining how these policies unfold.
As legal challenges to immigration policies continue, the outcomes of these cases will have significant implications for immigrants, advocacy groups, and government agencies. With court deadlines approaching, stakeholders are encouraged to stay engaged and consider submitting amicus briefs to advocate for their positions. The legal challenges to immigration policies continue to escalate, with lawsuits from both sides seeking to define the future of immigration enforcement in the U.S.
Stay Informed and Seek Legal Guidance
With immigration policies facing intense legal scrutiny, staying informed is crucial for anyone affected by these changes. Whether you are an immigrant seeking legal protection or an advocate fighting for immigrant rights, understanding legal challenges to immigration policies is essential.
At Qazi Law Offices, we are dedicated to defending immigrant rights and providing expert legal representation in this evolving landscape. If you or a loved one needs assistance navigating immigration law, we’re here to help.
📞 Call us now at 630-504-0648 or schedule a consultation with Attorney Farrah now.
Join Our Daily Live Shows: Tune in every day at 12 PM on TikTok and Facebook (Qazi Law Offices) for updates and advice.
Sign Up for Our Newsletter: Receive weekly immigration news and free toolkits.
Facebook: Qazi Law Offices
Instagram: AbogadaFarrahQazi
LinkedIn: Qazi Law offices